Pierview is built for AI search outcomes: getting mentioned, improving ranking, and closing the visibility gap across AI search platforms. Sentiment is the “quality control” layer — it tells you whether your visibility is helping you… or quietly sabotaging you.
What this metric answers
Use Sentiment to answer:- Are we being recommended, or just referenced?
- Do competitors get “trusted” language while we get “fine, I guess”?
- Which prompts create negative framing so we can fix the narrative?
- Did a launch / PR moment / new content change perception over time?
How Pierview measures sentiment
Pierview analyzes the language around your brand mention in each AI response and classifies it as:- Positive — recommendations, praise, favorable comparisons
- Neutral — factual mentions without clear judgment
- Negative — criticism, warnings, or unfavorable comparisons
What we look for
- Descriptive language: “reliable”, “trusted”, “best for”, “limited”, “expensive”
- Comparative framing: “better than”, “worse than”, “not as good as”
- Context cues: pricing objections, missing features, support concerns, complexity
Sentiment isn’t “vibes.” It’s positioning. AI models often mirror the tone of the sources they rely on — so improving sentiment usually starts with improving what the web says about you.
Interpreting sentiment
Think of sentiment like this:Positive
AI describes you as a strong choice (often recommended).
Neutral
You appear, but language is cautious or purely factual.
Negative
AI highlights drawbacks or warns users away (fix this first).
- 80–100: strong recommendation language
- 60–79: okay/neutral framing (you’re in the convo, not the default)
- 0–59: risk zone (users get reasons not to choose you)
Why sentiment matters in AI search
Pierview focuses on improving how you show up in AI-driven discovery. Sentiment matters because:- It affects trust: users don’t just want mentions — they want confidence.
- It shapes conversions: “recommended” converts better than “mentioned.”
- It changes competitive outcomes: when two brands are both visible, sentiment often decides the winner.
What drives sentiment
The biggest drivers are usually:- Source narrative: what high-authority pages say about you (reviews, lists, editorial)
- Message clarity: “best for X” vs vague positioning that invites doubt
- Comparison context: when competitors define the criteria, you can lose by default
- Freshness: sentiment can decay if old pages and old opinions dominate citations
How to improve sentiment (actionable checklist)
Fast wins (this week)
- Add an Objections FAQ (pricing, setup, accuracy, limitations)
- Tighten your “best for” statement across key pages and profiles
- Fix mismatched claims across your site vs directories (AI hates inconsistencies)
Compounding wins (this month)
- Publish comparison pages (fair criteria, clear tradeoffs)
- Get featured in roundups/listicles in your category (these often influence AI recommendations)
- Identify sources driving negative language, then:
- update/clarify your own content
- correct outdated third-party descriptions
- create a credible “proof” asset (benchmark, methodology, case study)